Loading...
Loading...
Choosing a time tracking solution? See how EasyClocking stacks up against the alternatives — feature by feature, dollar for dollar.
Enterprise-grade time tracking. EasyClocking offers comparable biometric accuracy at a fraction of the complexity and cost.
Full HCM suite with time and attendance. EasyClocking focuses specifically on time tracking with purpose-built biometric hardware.
Scheduling-first platform. EasyClocking combines scheduling with biometric time clocks for verified, accurate time data.
Mobile-first GPS time tracking for construction and field service. EasyClocking provides biometric hardware at fixed locations where buddy punching matters most.
Scheduling-first platform for hourly teams. EasyClocking serves industrial clock-forward environments where physical biometric clocks eliminate time theft.
Manual time tracking can cost up to $2,300 per employee annually in lost productivity and errors.
Free weekly brief
We track changes across UKG, Dayforce, Deputy, and more — get comparison updates and industry insights weekly.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Each comparison page follows the same honest format: a TL;DR section at the top with clear "choose them if / choose us if" guidance, followed by a 10-row feature comparison table covering areas like biometric options, pricing model, implementation timeline, and industry focus. We close with a candid assessment that acknowledges where each competitor has genuine strengths, because the right choice depends on your specific situation.
We make a deliberate effort to be fair. Each comparison page names specific areas where the competitor may be a better fit — for example, we acknowledge that UKG offers deeper enterprise analytics and that Deputy has stronger scheduling-first features. Our philosophy is that an informed buyer who chooses a competitor over us is better than an uninformed buyer who regrets their decision. We would rather help you make the right choice than win a deal on incomplete information.
We review and update comparison pages quarterly to reflect pricing changes, new feature releases, and shifts in competitor positioning. The time tracking market moves quickly, and we track changes across UKG, Dayforce, Deputy, ClockShark, and When I Work to ensure our comparisons stay accurate. Subscribe to our newsletter to get notified when significant updates are made.
If you are evaluating enterprise-grade HCM platforms, start with the UKG or Dayforce comparisons. If you are a construction company looking at mobile-first GPS tracking, the ClockShark comparison is most relevant. For businesses focused primarily on scheduling with time tracking as a secondary need, check the Deputy or When I Work comparisons. If you are currently using paper timesheets or spreadsheets, the Paper/Excel section on this page outlines the ROI case for switching to any automated solution.
We currently have detailed comparison pages for the five vendors we most commonly compete against: UKG, Dayforce, Deputy, ClockShark, and When I Work. If you are evaluating a different solution, our Gap Assessment tool can help you benchmark your current setup regardless of vendor, and our sales team can provide a custom comparison. We are also expanding our comparison library based on reader requests.
Feature-by-feature comparisons against UKG, Dayforce, Deputy, and more. Real strengths and weaknesses — not just marketing.
Trusted by 10,000+ teams in America's toughest industries